Premier Jim Prentice says Albertans should “look in the mirror” when it
comes to the financial woes now squeezing the province — and defends his
decision to reject corporate tax hikes while his government eyes higher
levies and deep spending cuts.
Huh? A new boss and he doesn't even get it. The problems lie right with the PC government and their mismanagement of the public purse. They've grown government exponentially, give themselves perks, wasted countless taxpayer money on projects for political gain and he blames us.
Maybe in a way he's right. We've kept electing them in for the last forty-two years.
James Lunney, a federal Conservative MP, is using his Twitter account
to come to the defence of an Ontario Progressive Conservative who told
reporters last week that he doesn't believe in evolution. The British Columbia chiropractor, first elected as a member of
Parliament in 2000, has jumped into a fray that started last week in the
Ontario Legislature. Ontario Progressive Conservative MPP Rick Nicholls, who represents
the province's Chatham-Kent-Essex riding, was heckling the
provincial education minister on Wednesday when the matter of human
origins came up. Education Minister Liz Sandals was responding to PC criticism of her
government’s new sex-education curriculum when she quipped that a
PC government "could opt out of teaching about evolution, too." "Not a bad idea," said Nicholls, who later clarified his position to reporters in the lobby. "For myself, I don’t believe in evolution," he said, adding that his views were "a personal stance" rather than party policy.
Oh the horror, someone who doesn't believe evolution! Must be a backwards neanderthal hick!
Even some scientists have discovered that The Big Bang may not have been the origin of life as what was once thought.
If a new theory turns out to be true, the universe may not have started with a bang.
In the new
formulation, the universe was never a singularity, or an infinitely
small and infinitely dense point of matter. In fact, the universe may
have no beginning at all.
"Our
theory suggests that the age of the universe could be infinite," said
study co-author Saurya Das, a theoretical physicist at the University of
Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada.
I am on the same page as Dr. Lunney, I believe in creation. There had to be an intelligent designer. Here is why I agree:
1. Fossils do not show evolution. Many undisputed fossil lineups should show transitions between the
unrelated creatures that evolutionists insist share common ancestry. But
the few fossil forms claimed by some evolutionists to represent
transitions between basic kinds are disputed by other evolutionists on
scientific grounds.1 2. Living creatures do not evolve between kinds. Experiments designed to detect evolution should have caught a glimpse
by now, but they have not. When researchers simulated fruit fly
evolution by systematically altering each portion of fruit fly DNA, they
found only three resulting fruit fly categories, published in 1980:
normal, mutant, or dead.2 A 2010 study found no net fruit fly evolution after 600 generations.3 Similarly, microbiologists watched 40,000 generations of E. coli bacteria become normal, mutant, or dead.4 None truly evolved.5 Big-picture evolution did not happen in the past, and it is not
happening now. Other evidence excludes evolution from real science. 3. Genetic entropy rules out evolution. Population geneticists count and describe genetic mutations over many
generations in creatures like plants and people. Mutations are copying
errors in the coded information carried by cells. The overwhelming
majority of mutations have almost no effect on the body. Also, far more
of these nearly neutral mutations slightly garble genetic information
than any others that might construct new and useful information.6
Therefore, many more slightly harmful mutations accumulate than any
other kind of mutation—a process called “genetic entropy.” Each
individual carries his own mutations, plus those inherited from all
prior generations. Cells are left to interpret the damaged information like scholars who
try to reconstruct text from tattered ancient scrolls. Ultimately, too
little information remains, resulting in cell death and eventually
extinction. Genetic entropy refutes evolution by ensuring that
information is constantly garbled and by limiting the total generations
to far fewer than evolutionary history requires. 4. All-or-nothing vital features refute evolution. Finally, transitioning between basic kinds is not possible because it
would disable vital creature features. For example, the reptile two-way
lung could not morph into a bird’s unique one-way lung. The reptile lung
would have to stop breathing while it waited for evolution to either
construct or transfer function to the new bones, air sacs, and
parabronchi required by the new bird system.7 Such a creature would suffocate in minutes, ending its evolution. Similarly, to transition from an amphibian’s three-chambered heart to a
mammal’s four-chambered heart would require either a new internal heart
wall that would block vital blood flow, or new heart vessels that would
fatally disrupt the amphibian’s vital blood flow. These four observations show why the unbiblical evolutionary idea that
creatures change without limits is unscientific. If creatures evolved
through nature—and not God—then Scripture is not trustworthy, since from
beginning to end it credits God as Creator.8 But science clearly confirms the Genesis creation account.
The Star reported the other day that the NDP and the Conservatives want to increase the amount of debates in this year's election from the normal two debates in the past, one in English and one in French. The Star is saying that especially the CPC wants more debates to "trap" the media party's precious little Justin.
At Issue discussed last night on the National. (via Nationalnewswatch)
.
There is no doubt Justin Trudeau is a gaffe machine. The media party
knows it and are afraid the one they favor will screw. I believe they
really don't want more debates because it will show Canadians how naive
and immature Justin really is.
I say the more debates the merrier. One on one like Justin vs. Thomas Mulcair and PM Harper vs. Justin etc. Bring them on.
I would also like to see a couple debates with the smaller parties. Most Canadians don't even realize for instance there is a Christian Heritage Party or a Libertarian Party. Rebel TV? Maybe you guys can take that on since the other media won't.
I would also like to see a couple debates with the smaller parties. Most Canadians don't even realize for instance there is a Christian Heritage Party or a Libertarian Party. Rebel TV? Maybe you guys can take that on since the other media won't, eh?
Since the Sun has set. Ezra Levant and Brian Lilley have started up The Rebel Media. So far working with a shoestring budget I'm already impressed. But to be a truly viable media source to give a truly conservative voice in Canada and to give the media party a run for their money, they need some help getting up and running. They will not be getting any taxpayer money or money from cable companies.
They have set up a crowdfunding page on their website. They have listed each item they will need and how much it will cost. Frankly I like that. I hope they can raise what they need as soon as possible so they can provide Canada with a true alternative. Do what you can to help out and spread the word. This is what you call real free enterprise. I wish Ezra and Brian success in their venture.
BTW. Would love to see the CBC having to rely on crowdfunding.
It's been a week now since Sunnews network has gone dark. I miss it but it looks like there will be sunny days again soon. Ezra Levant is starting The Rebel Media.
Faith Goldy another SNN alumni has started something withTrue North Report.
We can't keep conservative voices silenced. We need these other voices and opinions other than the usual lefty drivel from the usual boring CBC, CTV and Global. Support Ezra, Faith and Brian.
