More goofs, oops (lies) by the IPCC. IPCC report claimed 55 percent of land on which 60 percent of the Dutch live is below sea level. The real figure is 20 percent. The lies are sure starting to stack up.
IPCC AR4 reported:
The Netherlands is an example of a country highly susceptible to both sea-level rise and river flooding because 55% of its territory is below sea level where 60% of its population lives and 65% of its Gross National Product (GNP) is produced.
Dutch newspaper Vrij Nederland reported today (Google translation):
In its last Assessment Report on the impacts of climate change shows that 55% of Netherlands is below sea level in this area and that 65% of the gross national product is produced. These figures are far too high. The Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) is only one fifth of the Netherlands below sea level and there are only 19% instead of 65% of the GDP generated.
Not that 20% is something to be ignored if that’s what they think. But the percentage below sea level is the sort of thing that primary school geography classes should be able to get right. (h/t) Climate Audit
Get that politicians? Wake up! More and more of the IPCC claims are lies! They keep piling up. It's all a fraud! Stop this insanity! Premier Stelmach, stop wasting $2bill on carbon sequestration when you don't have to. Don't commit our money based on lies! PM Harper and Minister Prentice, quit all your global warming talk, instead call for an investigation into this fraud.
All I want the PM to do is to ask for an open debate.
ReplyDeleteThat is the very thing that Gore and Suzuki are afraid of so you have to ask why?
The science is NOT settled.
I would love a debate too, NeilD. I would like to see on national television a debate between Dr. Tim Ball and David Suzuki. Slim to no change that would happen unfortunately.
ReplyDelete"I would love a debate too, NeilD. I would like to see on national television a debate between Dr. Tim Ball and David Suzuki. Slim to no change that would happen unfortunately."
ReplyDeleteI don't understand why it's okay for a liberal not to debate if they don't want to.
If a conservative was called out to debate a contentious issue, the press would be all over this. Double standard again.