Thursday, September 16, 2010

Who Does the CBC Think They Are?

CBC, a crown corporation that the taxpayer funds to upwards of over $1 billion a year  even though their ratings keep going down, doesn't want to be accountable.  You got that right. They are fighting a court battle with the Information Commissioner not to be subject to the Access to Information Act like other institutions.
This week, CBC/Radio-Canada lawyers went to court in Montreal to plead that their Crown corporation not be subject to the Access to Information Act (AIA) like all other federal institutions.
The CBC has been bound by the AIA since 2007. However, it systematically applies a legal provision to reject requests for information arguing that these jeopardize its journalistic, creative or programming activities.
The Office of the Information Commissioner challenges this interpretation and wants to see the documents requested before judging if the loophole applies. The CBC refuses.
What this means is taxpayers are paying lawyers of both sides as the case goes before a judge.
Yes, we are footing the bill for both sides. Figure that one out!

The CBC always insists the government be held accountable, demanding documents and information but when the shoe is on the other foot it's a different story. Do as I say and not as I do!

Maybe this could be one of the reasons as to why they are refusing to release any information.
A good example of the usefulness of the AIA was revealed in Quebec a few months ago. Just after the CBC was made subject to the AIA, a sovereigntist activist, Patrick Bourgeois, requested a copy of the secret agreement between Radio-Canada and La Presse (a Montreal daily).
He obtained a copy of the secret deal signed in January 2000. Article 19 of the agreement specifically mentions “the parties (Radio-Canada and La Presse) vow not to reveal the content of this agreement.”
There is good reason why they don’t want us to know: Our taxes are funding a public broadcaster that signs backroom deals with a private company that already owns 70% of the printed papers in Quebec.
The deal goes on and on about the “cross-promotion,” “synergies” and “co-operation” between the two companies.
If any other public utility or department secretly signed a deal to promote the private interests of a private company, there would be a huge public outrage
So signing backroom deals with with private companies. Hmmm.........!  What other backrooms deals have Mothercorp signed on to that they don't want us to know about?  Have they signed backroom deals with the Liberal party for instance?   They sure do spew the Liberal party talking points to demonize the PM and the Conservatives everyday so one wonders. They don't like to give the Conservative point of view that's for sure. What about colluding with special interest groups? We need to know.

How are they spending  all that money that we are forced to give them?  We have a right to know that little tidbit of information.

It's obvious with their rigorous challenge to fight this they have something to hide. They're an elitist media and think they're above the law.  I hope the judge rules against them. It might bring them down a notch or two. 

They are a crown corporation publicly funded.  They should be held to account. They should live up to the standards they demand of the government.  Be subject to the Access to Information Act and release the information that has been requested!

Also, why is Sun Media the only ones covering this story? 

10 comments:

  1. '..why is Sun Media the only ones covering this story? '

    Fear of what taking on the powers at CBC 'could' do in revenge.

    Why is no Parliamentary Committee looking into this?
    that's one committee I would love to see Kady cover..... ha

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good question Farm girl? Whys is Sun Media the only MSM covering this story?
    I have noticed the National Post repeating CBC talking points. I have subscriptions to both The National Post and Sun chain.
    I will not hesitate to drop the National Post if they begin to compete for the same readership as the G+M and Toronto Star.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why is no Parliamentary Committee looking into this?
    that's one committee I would love to see Kady cover..... ha


    Wilson,there should be a parliamentary committee look into this but I doubt whether it would happen because of the coalition. Since they have a majority on these committees, they would never approve any kind of probe into Mothercorp.
    Ya,if by happen chance there were a probe, it would be shear pleasure to see how Kady would cover it. Just imagine her live blogging.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have noticed the National Post repeating CBC talking points.

    I have to,Fay. The NP has sure gone down hill in the last little while. I wonder if the new ownership has anything to do with it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Actually, it wouldn't just be an outrage, it would be criminal. When two or more companies enter into an unofficial agreement to financially aid one another at the expense of the market it's called collusion.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The CBC is the defacto mouthpiece of the LPC, and they think they are unaccountable to the taxpayer.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If it is illegal ? Then why has nothing been done?
    It appears that CBC is the KGB of the MSM in Canada.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 'It appears that CBC is the KGB of the MSM in Canada.'

    Fay, that's right, CBC-KGB style outlet uses the 'news' coverage -if any- as a camourflage so that they can do their backroom spinning with our money.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here is something to think about; The CBC campaign against Prime Minister Harper and the Conservative Pary of Canada could it be because the Conservatives would like to privatize CBC, and therefore force CBC to compete for air time with other stations. Just wondering out loud.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Here is something to think about; The CBC campaign against Prime Minister Harper and the Conservative Pary of Canada could it be because the Conservatives would like to privatize CBC, and therefore force CBC to compete for air time with other stations. Just wondering out loud.

    That could very well be but I think too that they just hate anything conservative.

    ReplyDelete

This is my home. I hope you respect it. I will not tolerate profanity or anything that is not suitable for family consumption.