Charles Adler hit one out of the ballpark again. Today he talked about those in Ottawa trashing the troops and the country over the Afghan detainees during the last week. He is angry at the opposition and all the talking heads running down our country.
Listen to him here at QR77 Click on 2:00 pm. About 7 minutes in and then continues after the news at bottom of the hour.
Thank-you Charles, you expressed exactly what I feel.
Friday, November 27, 2009
Current Abortion Policy out of Touch with Majority of Canadians
For nine years in a row a majority of Canadians favor some sort of restriction on abortion. A recent poll conducted by Environics found that:
56%, support legal protection at some stage before birth
30% support legal protection from conception on, after six months of pregnancy.
17% after three months of pregnancy
8% after six months of pregnancy.
Support for legal protection from conception on is much higher among women, 35%, than men at 25%.
Abortion funding:
68% of Canadians want privately funded
26% support tax-funding of all abortions down from 30% a year ago
18% or only tax-funded in cases of medical emergency "such as a threat to the mother's life or in cases of rape or incest.
Funding for medical procedures are a provincial responsibility. Our provincial governments need to defund this procedure that kills our most vulnerable precious unborn children. With governments right now scrambling to cut costs because of economic downturn, not only is it wrong to take our money to pay for something that according to this poll, a majority don't approve of but we also can't afford it.
56%, support legal protection at some stage before birth
30% support legal protection from conception on, after six months of pregnancy.
17% after three months of pregnancy
8% after six months of pregnancy.
Support for legal protection from conception on is much higher among women, 35%, than men at 25%.
Abortion funding:
68% of Canadians want privately funded
26% support tax-funding of all abortions down from 30% a year ago
18% or only tax-funded in cases of medical emergency "such as a threat to the mother's life or in cases of rape or incest.
Funding for medical procedures are a provincial responsibility. Our provincial governments need to defund this procedure that kills our most vulnerable precious unborn children. With governments right now scrambling to cut costs because of economic downturn, not only is it wrong to take our money to pay for something that according to this poll, a majority don't approve of but we also can't afford it.
Obama's Science Czar Invovled in Global Warming Fraud
Looks like John Holdren, President Barack Obama's Science Czar has been involved in this whole global warming scam. There are in this revelation that broke wide open, emails involving him.
Dr. Timothy Ball, a renowned climatologist points this out in this article he co-wrote in the Canada Free Press.
Holdren has extreme views on various issues like Population Control. This coming from Holdren himself:
"Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.
It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.
Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock."This is very disturbing. To think he is involved in this climate deception and advising the President of the United States of America.
Let us not be suckered in. If this man is an example of those who are trying to scam us out of our money and resources and want to control us, God help us!
Stand up now and let your leaders know that we don't want them signing on to anything in Copenhagen that will jeopardize our economies and our freedoms.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)